Human-verified evidence, or nothing

Nothing reaches your client until a named person signs it off.

AnswerLift is an evidence ledger for AI answer visibility. A Sprint asks your client’s buyer questions of the models behind ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity — through their official APIs, with the OpenAI, Anthropic and Perplexity models searching the web and Gemini answering from model knowledge — plus five open-API models for comparison. Each answer is stored verbatim with the exact model, the sources its search cited and the time. Your team adds what it saw by hand in the consumer apps. Then a named reviewer verifies every record — collected or hand-entered — before it can appear in a client report.

No estimated scores, anywhere. Collection runs only through official paid APIs, never by scraping a consumer interface, and every record says which engine, model and search method produced it. Where collection is off, the product says so instead of substituting a guess.

Worked example · what a Sprint report shows

One prompt, four major engines, one verified record

Fictional brand · illustrative figures · not a customer result

Fernhill Accounting (fictional) · fernhill.example

“Which accounting firms would you recommend for a UK e-commerce seller?”

Named by 2 of 4major engines

Counted from stored answers. No score.

Example: whether each engine named the fictional brand
EngineNamed?PositionSources
ChatGPTOpenAI GPT API (web search)Yes#3Own site cited · 1 of 5 sources
ClaudeClaude API (web search)No—Not cited · 0 of 4 sources
GeminiGemini API (assistant panel)No—No search · model knowledge
PerplexityPerplexity Sonar APIYes#2Own site cited · 1 of 6 sources
Claude API (web search)Not mentioned

The answer named three firms (Larkspur & Co, Brightwater Partners and Oakden Advisory — all fictional) and cited four directory and review pages; none on fernhill.example. The stored answer is kept in full for the reviewer and the client to read.

Verified by a named reviewer before it could appear in the client report

Records awaiting review are excluded from the client report by the data query itself. Each engine row is the model behind that assistant, asked through its official API — not a screenshot of the consumer app — and every record says which model and which search method produced it.

The differentiator

The evidence gate.

Every observation — whether a person typed it or a provider API returned it — starts life pending. A person reviews it against the stored answer text, puts their name to it, and marks it verified or needs-review. Only verified records are returned to the client report, and the exclusion is enforced in the data query, so an unverified record cannot reach a client screen even if someone rewrote the page.

Ask the same question again next month and it is stored as v2 of that prompt, alongside v1. Nothing overwrites, nothing is inferred, and a QA decision never rewrites the snapshot it was made about.

Recorded

Prompt, engine or provider model, cited sources, capture time, observation time

Classified

Cited · mentioned but not cited · not mentioned, plus confidence and volatility

Signed off

Named reviewer, review timestamp, and only then client-visible

What the software will not do

  • It does not drive or scrape the consumer ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or Perplexity apps. It asks the models behind them through official APIs and labels every record as an API answer, because an app adds its own memory and personalisation. Copilot, Grok and Google AI Overviews are not measured.
  • It will not invent, estimate or backfill an observation — there is no computed score anywhere in the product.
  • It will not show a client an unverified record.
  • It will not claim a collection happened when a provider could not be reached; a failed run is stored and reported as a failed run.

Choose the next right step

A clear commercial path—no mixed signals.

Available now

Free Snapshot

One brand, three buyer questions that do not name it, put to the models behind ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity. A person checks every answer, and you get back what each engine said and which sources it cited. Free, with no obligation.

Request Snapshot

Available now · £2,750 one-time

Visibility Sprint

Start a focused engagement to structure the evidence, priorities, handoff, and practical next actions.

See Sprint scope

Free · no subscription

Workspace software

Record and review evidence by hand at no cost. Automated answer-engine collection runs as part of a Sprint.

Create a free workspace

Built for agency handoffs

Make the work legible to everyone who has to move it forward.

Evidence is more useful when it carries scope, uncertainty, ownership, and review status with it—not when it is trapped in another dashboard.

Explore the product workflow
01

Strategist

Scopes the prompts, markets, and client questions worth observing.

02

Editor

Receives an assigned remediation brief with the evidence and approval context attached.

03

Account lead

Can explain what was observed, what is still uncertain, and what happens next.

04

Client

Receives a client-safe report containing only human-verified observations.

Straight answers

Questions agency teams ask before they commit.

    A Human-Verified Evidence Ledger for AI Answer Visibility